Book

KISS KISS, BANG BANG

ASHLEY & JAQUAVIS

Seeded Top-list proxy: 1,000 estimated copies sold

KISS KISS, BANG BANG is a book by ASHLEY & JAQUAVIS. The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime.

Search on Amazon

Description

About the work

Seeded

KISS KISS, BANG BANG is a book by ASHLEY & JAQUAVIS. The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime.

What makes it interesting is the prison-censorship logic: officials treat the book as a practical threat model and collapse the distinction between reading about something and doing it. As a book, it can be read not only for subject matter but for the way form, tone, and circulation make a text feel dangerous, intimate, or politically usable to anxious officials.

It also matters as part of a wider censorship history in Texas. The present page is a dossier starter built from source-tracked ban records; the surviving note currently says: The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: PAGES: 226-227 RAPE More publication history, translations, and close reading can be added later.

Overview

Why it was banned

Seeded

KISS KISS, BANG BANG entered censorship debates as a book associated with circulation politics, institutional control, and risk knowledge. In the current dossier, the main state objections cluster around instructional harm and public order.

The earliest event currently captured here is 2010-07-16 in Texas, where Texas corrections agencies and prison mailrooms excluded from prison circulation. The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: PAGE: 193- RAPE The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: PAGE: 193- RAPE

The record already stretches across Texas and Virginia, which is why the page should be read as a cross-border censorship trail rather than a single isolated dispute.

This page is intentionally incomplete. The ban history is a starter dataset, not a final census of every jurisdiction or decree.

Counter and critical readings

Context, rebuttals, and criticism

Reviewed

Ban history

Known government actions

Verified
Date Jurisdiction Action Reason Note
2010-07-16 Texas excluded from prison circulation The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: PAGE: 193- RAPE The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: PAGE: 193- RAPE
2011-03-01 Texas excluded from prison circulation The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: PAGES: 226-227 RAPE The Texas prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: PAGES: 226-227 RAPE
Date not yet pinned down Virginia excluded from prison circulation The Virginia prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: A1 The Virginia prison-ban record treats the book as excluded reading inside state custody, which shows how prison and mailroom censorship function as a government reading regime. The exported reason says: A1

Sources

Harvested references for this page