Novel

The 120 Days of Sodom

Marquis de Sade

French • 1904 publication of an 18th-century manuscript

Reviewed Top-list proxy: 500,000 estimated copies sold

An extreme libertine novel about power, cruelty, and systematic sexual violence.

Search on Amazon

Description

About the work

Reviewed

An extreme libertine novel about power, cruelty, and systematic sexual violence.

The 120 Days of Sodom is usually read through its treatment of sexual explicitness, violence, and philosophical transgression. As a novel, it turns those concerns into conflicts of character, voice, setting, and social pressure rather than leaving them as abstract ideas.

Part of the work's durability lies in the way its form intensifies its themes. Readers return to it not only for subject matter but for the distinctive voice, structure, and atmosphere through which it makes sexual explicitness, violence, and philosophical transgression feel immediate.

Overview

Why it was banned

Reviewed

The 120 Days of Sodom entered censorship debates as a novel associated with sexual explicitness, violence, and philosophical transgression. In the current dossier, the main state objections cluster around obscenity and sexual explicitness.

The earliest event currently captured here is 20th century in Australia, where Australian censors banned importation. Its combination of sadism and explicit material made it a routine target of censorship. Few books fit the classic obscenity-ban pattern more neatly than Sade.

This entry is still incomplete: more jurisdictions, court orders, and translated justifications should be added over time.

This page is intentionally incomplete. The ban history is a starter dataset, not a final census of every jurisdiction or decree.

Counter and critical readings

Context, rebuttals, and criticism

Reviewed

Ban history

Known government actions

Verified
Date Jurisdiction Action Reason Note
20th century Australia banned importation Its combination of sadism and explicit material made it a routine target of censorship. Few books fit the classic obscenity-ban pattern more neatly than Sade.

Sources

Harvested references for this page