Songbook

Why Was He Born So Beautiful And Other Rugby Songs

Unknown author

1967

Seeded Top-list proxy: 1,000 estimated copies sold

Why Was He Born So Beautiful And Other Rugby Songs is a songbook by Unknown author. It is accordingly declared to be indecent."

Search on Amazon

Description

About the work

Seeded

Why Was He Born So Beautiful And Other Rugby Songs is a songbook by Unknown author. It is accordingly declared to be indecent."

Its interest lies partly in the way literary or informational writing gets collapsed into a public-morality problem. As a songbook, it can be read not only for subject matter but for the way form, tone, and circulation make a text feel dangerous, intimate, or politically usable to anxious officials.

It also matters as part of a wider censorship history in New Zealand. The present page is a dossier starter built from source-tracked ban records; the surviving note currently says: Ruled indecent in 1968: "This is an anthology of bawdy songs, said to be popular among players of Rugby union football. Some are diverting; many are crudely indecent. The question for the Tribunal is not whether. More publication history, translations, and close reading can be added later.

Overview

Why it was banned

Seeded

Why Was He Born So Beautiful And Other Rugby Songs entered censorship debates as a songbook associated with morality, print scandal, and sexuality. In the current dossier, the main state objections cluster around obscenity and public morality.

The earliest event currently captured here is 1968 in New Zealand, where Indecent Publications Tribunal classified, prohibited, or restricted. Ruled indecent in 1968: "This is an anthology of bawdy songs, said to be popular among players of Rugby union football. Some are diverting; many are crudely indecent. The question for the Tribunal is not whether. Ruled indecent in 1968: "This is an anthology of bawdy songs, said to be popular among players of Rugby union football. Some are diverting; many are crudely indecent. The question for the Tribunal is not whether footballers should amuse themselves by bawling.

This entry is still incomplete: more jurisdictions, court orders, and translated justifications should be added over time.

This page is intentionally incomplete. The ban history is a starter dataset, not a final census of every jurisdiction or decree.

Counter and critical readings

Context, rebuttals, and criticism

Reviewed

Ban history

Known government actions

Verified
Date Jurisdiction Action Reason Note
1968 New Zealand classified, prohibited, or restricted Ruled indecent in 1968: "This is an anthology of bawdy songs, said to be popular among players of Rugby union football. Some are diverting; many are crudely indecent. The question for the Tribunal is not whether. Ruled indecent in 1968: "This is an anthology of bawdy songs, said to be popular among players of Rugby union football. Some are diverting; many are crudely indecent. The question for the Tribunal is not whether footballers should amuse themselves by bawling.

Sources

Harvested references for this page